More Medical Killing – Now Montana
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on December 31st, 2009
By exploiting the emotions of the vulnerable, and the sympathies of the uninformed, society is on its way to the regulated killing the ‘imperfect,’ ‘who are going to die anyways.’ These, as we are regularly told, are those who, ‘cost us the most money’ and ‘are a burden to the healthcare system.’
Remember, Healthcare Reform is NOT designed to give more care to those who actually need it, because that is ‘costly.’ The goal of healthcare reform is to control costs. Killing the depressed is a cost-saver.
- Brian Johnston, Executive Director California ProLife Council
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-12-31-Montana-suicide_N.htm
ObamCare Means Canadian Style Health Care Rationing
Posted by Mike Spence in Uncategorized on December 18th, 2009
President Obama and Nancy Pelosi hold the Canadian health care system up as a prototype for the United States. This video, produced by the Reason Foundation, the story of a Canadian women who waited three years for a hip replacement and finally went to the United States to get the care she needed. If the government takes over, Americans will be in the waiting room for years not hours.
A True Tale of Canadian Health Care: Why some patients need to go to the U.S. for surgery
Euthanasia Update
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on December 14th, 2009
“Learning through Killing”
The Dutch are the post-War leaders in the concept of intentionally killing those who are perceived to be, ‘lacking a quality life.’ While practitioners tend to hide behind the notion that one must ask, the government itself has chronicled many acts of unrequested euthanasia.
But instead of bringing a “Brave New World” of medical freedom and vibrant living it has created medical madness and confusion. Fear and abandonment are its fruit.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234295/Now-Dutch-turn-legalised-mercy-killing.html
Reid Bill Provisions Threaten Rationing
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on December 2nd, 2009
While the abortion provisions of ObamaCare have gotten the most
attention, we must remember his express intent – “To extend healthcare
to all” and simultaneously “cut costs.” What does that mean? RATIONING.
Read more here: http://www.nrlc.org/press_releases_new/Release112409.html
23 Year “Coma” — Truth Unveiled
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on December 2nd, 2009
Brian Johnston: “Some of my friends wonder why I don’t like the idea of calling someone a ‘vegetable.’ A carrot has a vegetative state. You, and other human beings have a human state. There are no ‘more human’ humans, and none who are less.”
CNN Poll: Majority Favor Abortion Funding Ban in Health Care Bill
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on November 18th, 2009
Posted by Brian Johnston to the CPLC Blog November 18th, 2009
Even the pro-Obama folks at CNN recognize that the majority of Americans do not want the government funding abortions. But even so, President Obama has promised Planned Parenthood that he will strip out the restrictions currently in the House bill.
Today’s poll by CNN shows that Obama’s commitment to the abortion lobby goes directly against the wishes of the American people.
Washington (CNN)– Six in 10 Americans favor a ban on the use of federal funds for abortion, according to a new poll which also indicates that the public may also favor legislation that would prevent many women from getting their health insurance plan to cover the cost of an abortion, even if no federal funds are involved.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday morning indicates that 61 percent of the public opposes the use of public money for abortions for women who can not afford the procedure, with 37 percent in favor of allowing the use of federal funds.
And by a 51 percent to 45 percent margin, those questioned in the survey think that a women who get abortions should pay the full costs out of their own pocket, even if they have private health insurance and no federal funds are involved. The 6-point difference is within the poll’s sampling error.
The health care reform bill that narrowly passed in the House of Representatives on November 7 included tight restrictions on the use of federal money for abortion coverage. Abortion rights activists are strongly opposed to such restrictions.
Minneapolis Star-Tribune: Abortion Curbs Have Democrats in Dilemma
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on November 12th, 2009
“Pro-life Democrats with resolve have brought a ‘tar baby’ to the Democrat’s Healthcare debate. Congressman Bart Stupak was willing to risk his career in facing down Speaker Pelosi, and it was the Speaker who blinked.
Now the Democrats find themselves with a bill that many radical, pro-abortion members of their party cannot stomach.
Check out the article here: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/congress/69817632.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUX
Why the fuss on Obamacare and Abortion Funding?
Posted by Mike Spence in Uncategorized on September 29th, 2009
In the Health Care debate one issue always seems to bubble to the top.
Abortion funding.
Why is the abortion funding so important?
A June 2009 Guttmacher Institute (a pro-abortion research arm) commissioned a study that found that one in 4 that would seek a taxpayer-funded abortion don’t have one if funding is unavailable.
On August 19, 2009 — In a conference call with supporters, President Obama said that it is a “fabrication” to say that the legislation backed by the White House would result in “government funding of abortions,” and that this is “untrue.”
The President and his surrogates have continued that line.
Several weeks after his initial remarks, the house adopted the Capps amendment.
The committee, 30 – 28, approved it narrowly with most but not all Democrats voting in favor and no Republicans backing it.
The Capps amendment states that some abortions “shall” be covered by the “public option” plan, specifically those types of abortions that Congress allows to be covered under Medicaid, under the so-called “Hyde Amendment,” which has been attached regularly to appropriations bills for many years. These are abortions performed in cases or rape or incest, or to save the life of the mother.
As for other types of abortions, the Capps amendment leaves it to the secretary of Health and Human Services to decide whether or not they will be covered. It says, “Nothing in this Act shall be construed as preventing the public health insurance option from providing” abortion services that would not be legal for Medicaid coverage.
The Capps Amendment MANDATES that the public plan cover any Medicaid-fundable abortions, and AUTHORIZES the secretary to cover all other abortions. From day one, she [Secretary Kathleen Sebelius] is authorized to pay for them all. “
While running for President Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood “In my mind, Reproductive care is essential care. It is basic care, and so it is at the center and at the heart of the plan that I propose.” He stated that, “What we’re doing is to say that we’re gonna set up a public plan that all persons and all women can access if they don’t have health insurance. It’ll be a plan that will provide all essential services, including reproductive services.”
The record on Life for this administration is clear. The president overturned the prohibition on taxpayer funding being used to support the abortion industry overseas, reaffirmed support for the tragic Roe vs. Wade decision and appointed dozens of pro-abortion activists and lawmakers to key posts in his administration.
One of them is the Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, who as a Governor vetoed a ban on late term abortions.
The House bill gives HER the power to decide about abortion funding.
Finally there is one way to know for sure that abortion is provided for in the Health care bill. The amendments to specifically exclude it were defeated.
On July 30, Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-PA), with co-sponsors Reps. Stupak and Roy Blunt (R-MO), offered an amendment that excluded any mandate for abortion coverage, except to save the mother’s life and in cases of rape or incest. At first the Pitts amendment passed, 31-yes, 27-no. Rep. Waxman moved to reconsider the vote. On the second vote, the Pitts Amendment failed, 29-yes, 30-no.
Rep. Stupak, with co-sponsor Rep. Pitts, offered an amendment specifying that no funds authorized by the Act may be used to pay for any abortion or cover the costs of any health plan that includes coverage for abortion, except to save the mother’s life or in cases of rape or incest. The Stupak amendment failed, 27-yes, 31-no.
If funding and subsidies aren’t in the plan, why won’t Congress vote to say just that?
Report%20warns%20doctors%20snub%20families%20of%20the%20terminally%20ill%20amid%20growing%20use%20of%20death%20pathway%20%20%7C%20Mail%20Online
Posted by Brian in Uncategorized on September 15th, 2009
The culture of Death, and money saving measures have been used and will only be used more as the government restructures who they are going to help.
This article from England explains how the health-care system there intentionally hides their actions from loved ones.
Are you ready for what’s coming?